1,301 articles and 8,586 comments as of Saturday, January 9th, 2010

Monday, January 4, 2010

SharePoint Identity Crisis

Michael HinckleyAuthor: Michael Hinckley

At a previous job my task was to manage Anti-terrorism training products. During the course of researching I stumbled upon an article that looked at a terrorist cell and posed an interesting question of “which one in the cell would be the best person to take out?” In other words stopping which person would cause the group to disintegrate. Is it the ideologue? Is it the actual person who carries out the fatal end? Is it the accountant who funds the operation?


Oddly enough it wasn’t any of these roles. It was a sort of middle man who carried money, means and instructions from the buffers to upper end of leadership to the support people in the field cells. Ever since reading this I always keep this concept in mind.

It wasn’t until I began using and propagating SharePoint usage that I saw the true model of this theory. As it has been mentioned in many blogs and white papers, SharePoint gets pushed from the top level decision makers, through IT and onto the end user without much guidance, thought or direction. The foremost flaw is the “not understanding” how SharePoint needs to be used for the Business at hand. Usually this knowledge does not lay with executive leadership, not with IT units who deploy it, and certainly not in the end user who is too busy performing to have to worry about how to translate it to their daily routine.

Who then shuttles in between these groups? Who has the familiarly with all, yet remains objective of each. This is a person who can step all ways to gather the message of the ideal, the limits of IT operations and the environment of the executer. But what role or title do they hold?

The middle man concept somewhat works but that refers more to the settling up both parties involved and exiting once the deal has been made. Our person guides, advises, evangelizes SharePoint and business.

Where and who is this person? A project manager, the trainer, maybe a unit manager, perhaps a business analyst, or could it be a consultant?

In the next installment of this series I will go further into this SharePoint Identity Crisis.

Michael HinckleyAuthor: Michael Hinckley

After ten plus years of developing and managing e learning projects I have found myself in the unique position to drive the innovation at an enterprise level.

My current title is Instructor at Citibank, although training delivery is one aspect of what I do, most of my job and interests included knowledge and content management and how it can be effectively distributed. This path has led me to SharePoint technologies as the medium to deliver customized “just in time training” and knowledge solutions.

When I am not tinkering under my MOSS sites hoods and bothering the IT department regarding admin level permissions you’ll find me either at home relaxing with my wonderful wife and three children or at my boxing gym trying to improve my “sweet science” despite the science of gravity and advancing years.

View all entries in this series: MichaelHinckley - SP ID Crisis»
Entries in this series:
  1. SharePoint Identity Crisis
 

Please Join the Discussion

3 Responses to “SharePoint Identity Crisis”
  1. Stephen Hughes says:

    I am looking forward to reading more on this as it is one of those common issues. I have moved intoa new job to further my SharePoint skills, but after 2 compnaies I am seeing this trend that the upper management want it, but it has a poor take up.
    Look forward to the next article

  2. Mike Bunyan says:

    Good start. I’ll call it ‘abrogation’. I’m looking forward to more where I hope you will highlight the disjoin between governance and leadership that often occurs.

  3. Xene says:

    I really enjoy your analogies and I can’t wait to follow your series. Lately I’ve been equating Sharepoint with one of those little bouncy balls. Great idea, but watch out, all kinds of hidden dangers lurk there (those things can take an eye out!) But with a well laid out governance plan, including security measures, document management, branding policies, etc, all acting as a big plastic sphere to hold the ball in its place; then add the right people to shake the sphere, that ball may bounce in control forever, continually touching every point of the organization, invigorating everything it contacts. However, if the ball has no sphere – PHEW, watch out! That ball bounces into enough things to cause mayhem and then eventually rolls into a corner to collect dust and get vacuumed out with the next big clean. But I’m on a team that is building our sphere, and I’m shaking it with care, just enough so that balls can really start to bounce in our section,and already it’s bumping (with control) into others! It’s an uphill battle, but isn’t that the very nature of an evengalists? Believe, embrace, persevere, convert by example! I am very much looking forward to your thoughts on the middle man (or woman) as the pivotal role in this process.


Notify me of comments to this article:


Speak and you will be heard.

We check comments hourly.
If you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!