Comments on: Understanding Managed Metadata in SharePoint 2010: its Impact on Taxonomy, Navigation and Search – Part 1: Focusing on Managed Metadata, Term Store, Navigation and Search http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/ Just another WordPress weblog Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:48:20 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jeremy http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-324 Jeremy Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:30:06 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-324 Tom - I too am looking for a way to do this. When I figure it out, I will post a link to the solution here. Tom – I too am looking for a way to do this. When I figure it out, I will post a link to the solution here.

]]>
By: SC Vinod http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-312 SC Vinod Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:39:58 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-312 Hi Fabian, Great article....Can we see an example for Multi Lingual support soon?? Hi Fabian,

Great article….Can we see an example for Multi Lingual support soon??

]]>
By: Kevbo http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-306 Kevbo Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:44:27 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-306 Word of warning on allowing multiple values.... You cannot group or sort by fields that allow multiple values :( Word of warning on allowing multiple values….
You cannot group or sort by fields that allow multiple values :(

]]>
By: Greg http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-271 Greg Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:20:17 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-271 Fabian, I read your series with great interrest but can't figure out if the abilitity to navigate via Managed Metadata and use key filters etc... is limited to what is available OOTB on a list 'view'. Could the control, fields, tree type w/ expand and collapse, key filter w/ search as you type etc... be available as a 'separate webpart you could drop on a page and connect to a DVWP or LVWP? Thanks alot for sharing! Greg PS: Note that I am asking the same question on Jeff Carr's series as well Fabian,

I read your series with great interrest but can’t figure out
if the abilitity to navigate via Managed Metadata and use key filters etc… is limited to what is available OOTB on a list ‘view’.
Could the control, fields, tree type w/ expand and collapse, key filter w/ search as you type etc…
be available as a ’separate webpart you could drop on a page and connect to a DVWP or LVWP?
Thanks alot for sharing!
Greg

PS: Note that I am asking the same question on Jeff Carr’s series as well

]]>
By: Shahid http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-254 Shahid Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:38:40 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-254 Great Article Fabian, I have a quick question, so we know how we can setup a default column value at the document library level or at each folder level, based on a client requirement I wanted to know if we can have inheritance based column values, so for instance I have three folders (folder 1, 2 and 3) with 2 being inside 1 and 3 being in 2, now i want folder 2 to have a default value of its own and also the default values for the folder 1 when I add documents to the folder 2 and same for folder 3 where I get the default values from folder 1 and folder 2 and also default valule from folder 3.. let me know what you think of this.. thanks Great Article Fabian,

I have a quick question, so we know how we can setup a default column value at the document library level or at each folder level, based on a client requirement I wanted to know if we can have inheritance based column values, so for instance I have three folders (folder 1, 2 and 3) with 2 being inside 1 and 3 being in 2, now i want folder 2 to have a default value of its own and also the default values for the folder 1 when I add documents to the folder 2 and same for folder 3 where I get the default values from folder 1 and folder 2 and also default valule from folder 3..

let me know what you think of this..
thanks

]]>
By: Greg http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-243 Greg Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:39:38 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-243 Mark, I am guessing you had to tag all the past articles on EUSP & EUSP2010? Curious to see how it is coming? What are the ECM features you are leveraging in the forthcoming platform? Did you find limitations to OOTB features? Currently wondering how to really use the content organiser since you can't set the targeted folder dynamicaly (from a metadata tag or a drop downn field).... Anyway, good luck! Greg Mark,
I am guessing you had to tag all the past articles on EUSP & EUSP2010?
Curious to see how it is coming?
What are the ECM features you are leveraging in the forthcoming platform?
Did you find limitations to OOTB features?
Currently wondering how to really use the content organiser since you can’t set the targeted folder dynamicaly (from a metadata tag or a drop downn field)….
Anyway, good luck!
Greg

]]>
By: Herbal Kint http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-216 Herbal Kint Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:51:59 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-216 Hello Fabian, First off: kudos on the article! There is, however, one thing I'm missing in about every article I've come across regarding the use of managed metadata: how to allow for (preferably automated) adding of metadata when uploading multiple docs that are contained in a folder tree. You simply cannot expect end users to be bothered with this manually, thus eliminating the benefits of this powerful feature. Document Sets seemed a great way of doing this, but I always seem to stumble on the limiation that only the docs/folders in the top level receive metadata, while the docs in subfolders don't get any (rendering them invisible when filtering or searching based on the metadata. Do you have any suggestions as to how I could address this problem, or can't it be done in SharePoint 2010? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Herbal Kint Hello Fabian,

First off: kudos on the article!

There is, however, one thing I’m missing in about every article I’ve come across regarding the use of managed metadata: how to allow for (preferably automated) adding of metadata when uploading multiple docs that are contained in a folder tree. You simply cannot expect end users to be bothered with this manually, thus eliminating the benefits of this powerful feature. Document Sets seemed a great way of doing this, but I always seem to stumble on the limiation that only the docs/folders in the top level receive metadata, while the docs in subfolders don’t get any (rendering them invisible when filtering or searching based on the metadata.

Do you have any suggestions as to how I could address this problem, or can’t it be done in SharePoint 2010? Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Herbal Kint

]]>
By: Tom http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-199 Tom Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:16:45 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-199 Is it possible to show the Metadata Navigator on a page other than the full list page? i.e., I want to drop the list on a different page but then still use the Metadata Navigator to filter down. Is it possible to show the Metadata Navigator on a page other than the full list page? i.e., I want to drop the list on a different page but then still use the Metadata Navigator to filter down.

]]>
By: Johan http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-152 Johan Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:21:01 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-152 Great article Fabian! Don't know if this is within your area of expertise, but essentially I'm building a web part to customize to view/edit actions for a particular library. Documents are scanned, e-mailed and picked up by SharePoint. New documents are added to a drop-off library, where the idea is that they are inspected and tagged (using managed metadata), which upon they are transferred to their final destination (another library). The end users really want to inspect the pdf files in the view as they are tagging the document, hence the web part. It's all simple, except for editing the metadata. Ideally I would like to achieve a similar functionality of the standard editing form, but I realize that may be a lot to wish for. Do you have any ideas of a solution, in general? The requirements are essentially that the pdf document should be displayed when an item is selected, that some type of editing capability is available along with the list of items. Regards, Johan Great article Fabian!

Don’t know if this is within your area of expertise, but essentially I’m building a web part to customize to view/edit actions for a particular library. Documents are scanned, e-mailed and picked up by SharePoint. New documents are added to a drop-off library, where the idea is that they are inspected and tagged (using managed metadata), which upon they are transferred to their final destination (another library). The end users really want to inspect the pdf files in the view as they are tagging the document, hence the web part. It’s all simple, except for editing the metadata. Ideally I would like to achieve a similar functionality of the standard editing form, but I realize that may be a lot to wish for.

Do you have any ideas of a solution, in general? The requirements are essentially that the pdf document should be displayed when an item is selected, that some type of editing capability is available along with the list of items.

Regards,
Johan

]]>
By: EndUserSharePoint http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/2010/06/01/understanding-managed-metadata-in-sharepoint-2010-its-impact-on-taxonomy-navigation-and-search-part-1-focusing-on-managed-metadata-term-store-navigation-and-search/comment-page-1/#comment-150 EndUserSharePoint Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:57:42 +0000 http://www.endusersharepoint.com/EUSP2010/?p=716#comment-150 One way is to set all of the appropriate meta data columns to a default value. When you move the files in, they will inherit those values. Once the migration is complete, reset the default values to none. -- Mark One way is to set all of the appropriate meta data columns to a default value. When you move the files in, they will inherit those values. Once the migration is complete, reset the default values to none. — Mark

]]>