88 articles and 186 comments as of Friday, September 10th, 2010

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Taxonomy, Metadata and Information Architecture in SharePoint 2010 – Series Summary and Conclusions

Guest Author: Jeff Carr

Our enterprise systems themselves are only able to take us so far, and it’s crucial to be cognizant of the fact that there’s still a lot of outside work that needs to be done. The underlying foundation required to leverage our technological capability is derived from the establishment of strong publishing models, standard workflow processes, corporate governance, continuous taxonomy management and well trained users that have been included as key stakeholders throughout the design process. 

The many great features and functionality offered as part of the SharePoint 2010 platform are sure to provide the foundation for better management of information in the organization. Even with the introduction of the Term Store Management Tool and many of the other areas discussed in this series, it’s important to return to the beginning and remind ourselves that SharePoint itself, at least at this point in time, is not intended nor should it be perceived as an enterprise-wide taxonomy management tool. SharePoint 2010 still lacks functionality in a number of key areas, such as the ability to perform auto-categorization and the management of complex relationships between terms. 

SharePoint is one of many enterprise solutions we employ, and to make it effective we must ensure that we take the steps necessary to fully understand our domains of knowledge. Doing so provides us with the ability to design appropriate solutions that best describe in detail the world in which we operate. To fully leverage our technical capability, we must strive to implement solid processes around information architecture and ensure we understand conceptually how they need to be represented within our technological environments.

The development of enterprise taxonomy, as a concept in and of itself, is a technologically agnostic exercise. Its application to technology as an enrichment activity is where the rubber meets the road and the benefits are realized. Without a solid foundation, chaos in terms of findability and a good user experience are inevitable. With it, we stand an increased chance at success.

Guest Author: Jeff Carr

Jeff Carr is an Information Architect and Search Consultant with Earley & Associates specializing in user centered information design. Working with SharePoint since 2003, he has been involved in the design, development and integration of web-based solutions from intranets and extranets to public facing websites for a variety of large enterprises across a wide range of industries.

Bookmark and Share
 

Please Join the Discussion

2 Responses to “Taxonomy, Metadata and Information Architecture in SharePoint 2010 – Series Summary and Conclusions”
  1. Kerri says:

    Thanks for the series Jeff, as we move toward a 2010 upgrade, this has been very helpful!

  2. Greg says:

    Jeff,
    I read your series with great interrest but can’t figure out
    if the abilitity to navigate via Managed Metadata and use key filters etc… is limited to what is available OOTB on a list ‘view’.
    Could the control, fields, tree type w/ expand and collapse, key filter w/ search as you type etc…
    be available as a ’separate webpart you could drop on a page and connect to a DVWP or LVWP?
    Thanks alot for sharing!
    Greg

Subscribe without commenting

Speak and you will be heard.

We check comments hourly.
If you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!